Public library charges for lending printed music
This article presents the results, up to September 2013, of ongoing research by Tony Lynes on behalf of Making Music. It summarises the legislation relating to local authorities’ duty to provide a music lending service and their power to charge borrowers for this service; shows how this power is used (or exceeded) by 31 local authorities for which information was obtained; compares the widely diverging charges made for a typical loan of vocal scores; and concludes that at least a substantial minority of library authorities are making illegal charges and that there is a strong case for amending the law.
Library authorities’ duty to provide a music lending service
The duties of public library authorities and their powers to impose charges are to be found in the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964 and the Library Charges (England and Wales) Regulations 1991. Section 7(1) of the Act requires every library authority to “provide a comprehensive and efficient library service for all persons desiring to make use thereof”. While the authority may make facilities for borrowing “books and other materials” available to anybody, it is obliged to do so only for persons living, working or studying full-time within the local area (described below as “local borrowers”). Precisely who or what is a local borrower may, however, be open to question if the materials are to be loaned not to an individual but to a choir or other group, some of whose members are local people and others not.
Section 7(2) of the Act requires a library authority, in fulfilling its duty under section 7(1), to
“have regard to the desirability . . . of securing, by the keeping of adequate stocks, by arrangements with other library authorities, and by any other appropriate means, that facilities are available for the borrowing of, or reference to, books and other printed matter, and pictures, gramophone records, films and other materials, sufficient in number, range and quality to meet the general requirements and any special requirements both of adults and children.”
The term “books and other printed matter” undoubtedly includes vocal and instrumental scores. A library authority, therefore, must at least “have regard to the desirability” of lending scores in adequate numbers to local borrowers, whether from its own stocks or by means of inter-library loans
The power to impose charges
Section 8 of the Act, headed “Restriction on charges for library facilities”, gives the Secretary of State power to make regulations authorising charges for facilities specified in the regulations, but not for the loan of “written material” to local borrowers. “Written material”, for this purpose, includes “any book, journal, pamphlet or other similar article”. Whether a single sheet of music is a “pamphlet or other similar article” may be debatable, but a bound vocal or orchestral score is certainly a book and therefore covered by this definition.
While loan charges to local borrowers for bound volumes and probably also for single sheet scores are unlawful, section 8(3) concludes:
“ . . . this subsection shall not prevent any regulations under this section from authorising the making of charges in respect of the use of any facility for the reservation of written materials or in respect of borrowed materials which are returned late or in a damaged condition.”
Accordingly, regulation 3(2)(b) of the 1991 Library Charges (England and Wales) Regulations provides that a library authority may make a charge
“ . . . for reserving for any person library material or library apparatus, whether that material or apparatus is for the time being held by the relevant authority or needs to be obtained from elsewhere and whether for the purpose of lending the material or apparatus to that person or making it available for his use on library premises, and for notifying that person that that material or apparatus has become available or is not available for borrowing or use by him.”
Since a loan to a local borrower can legally be subject to a reservation charge but not to a loan charge, it is important that there should be a clear distinction between the two. If the material is both required and available immediately, the need for reservation presumably does not arise and no reservation charge should be made. Most requests for the loan of sets of vocal or instrumental scores, however, are made in advance – and, even if they are not, the library will probably need time to explore the possibility of an inter-library loan. There will, therefore, be a period during which the scores can be said to be “reserved”, possibly justifying a reservation charge. Such a charge can reasonably take into account the number of items (e.g., as shown below, Portsmouth charges a “request fee” of £15 per 40 vocal scores, and Southwark charges 20p per item with a minimum charge of £2); but a charge based on the duration of the loan (e.g., Kent charges £2 or £4 per month for a loan of vocal scores, depending on the length of the work, and Herts charges £2 per month for 10 vocal scores or a packaged set) is clearly a loan charge, not a reservation charge, and, if applied to a local borrower, is therefore illegal.
Regulation 4 leaves the amount of any permitted charge to be fixed at the discretion of the authority. It also allows the authority, instead of making a charge for each use of the library facilities, to “charge an annual subscription or a deposit in respect of all or some of such facilities”. The legality of the practice adopted by some authorities of requiring payment of both a loan charge and an annual subscription is doubtful – but, more importantly, neither type of charge is permissible if the borrower is a local resident, worker or student.
Display of charges
Whatever system of charges is adopted, whether for music or other materials, regulation 5 (“Display of charges”) should be noted:
“A relevant authority which makes a charge in accordance with regulation 3 shall display in a conspicuous place within each library premises occupied by the relevant authority a notice which is easily readable specifying the library facilities made available by the authority for which it makes a charge and, in the case of each such facility, the amount of the charge or the basis on which the charge will be calculated.”
What happens in practice: charges for borrowing vocal score sets
The table below summarises information about charges made by 31 local authorities for loans of sets of vocal scores (ILL = inter-library loan). The selection of these authorities was largely haphazard, depending on access to email addresses and websites. Some of the information may be incomplete or out of date, especially where obtained from websites.
|Library authority||Charging criteria||Charges|
|Blackburn with Darwen||Number of scores; duration of loan; ILL charge||Up to 10 scores £6; 11-15 £10; 16 or more £15, for 12 weeks. ILL reservation & admin. fees £2.50.|
|Brighton & Hove||Duration of loan||£25 per month ((£15 for groups local to the City).|
|Cheshire East||Number of scores||1-20 £15; 21-40 £27; 41-60 £40; each additional £1.20.|
|City of London||Number of scores||£5 per 50 scores.|
|Cornwall||Number of scores; duration of loan||£1 per score for 6 months.|
|Cumbria||Number of scores; duration of loan; ILL charge||£1.50 per score (ILLs £2 per score) for 6 months.|
|Derbyshire||Annual subscription (size of group)OR pay-as-you-go – number of scores;duration of loan||Up to 20 members £20; 21-50 £50; 51-100 £100; 101+ £200; professionals £500.£10 per 12 scores for 13 weeks
|Essex||Annual subscription; number of scores; duration of loan||Subscription £15 (£40 for group outside Essex). £1.50 per score (£10 for set of sheets) for 12 weeks.|
|Hampshire||Annual subscription; number of scores||Subscription £10. £7.50 per 20 scores (for maximum 9 months).|
|Herts.||Number of scores; duration of loan; ILL charge||£2 per month for 10 scores or packaged set, plus £7 minimum charge for ILL.|
|Kent||Length of work; duration of loan; ILL charge||5 minutes or more £4 per month; less than 5 minutes £2 per month (out of Kent groups £10/£5). ILL charge £4.|
|Lancashire||Number of scores||£10 per 40 scores.|
|Lincolnshire||Annual subscription + ILL chargeOR reservation fee + ILL charge||Subscription £25. ILL charge £4.Reservation 50p per item (25p on-line). ILL charge £4.|
|Liverpool||Annual subscription (+ delivery charge)||Subscription £28 (for group outside Liverpool £58).|
|Manchester||Number of scores; duration of loan||Large scores 25p per score for 28 days; small scores 12p per score for 28 days (non-Manchester groups 50p/25p).|
|Middlesbrough||Number of scores; delivery charge||£10 per 20 scores; delivery £5.|
|Nottingham||Annual subscription based on size of group + ILL charge||Up to 30 members £25; 31-60 £50; 61-90 £75; 91+ £100; professionals £300. ILL charge £5.|
|Oldham||Annual subscription; charge per set||Subscription £18; charge per set £5.|
|Portsmouth||Number of scores||£15 per 40 scores.|
|Richmond upon Thames||Number of scores, + charge for items not in stock||£15 for 25 scores; charge for items not in stock.|
|Rochdale||ILL charge||No charge for sets in stock; £8 per set for ILL request + actual ILL charge if excessive.|
|Somerset||Number of scores||£4 per 5 scores.|
|Southampton||Number of scores||£15 per 40 scores.|
|Southwark||Number of scores; reservation charge||20p per score (minimum £2).|
|Suffolk||Annual subscription; duration of loan; ILL charge||Subscription £1.75 per member, minimum £10.50 (non-Suffolk group £3.50 per member, minimum £35). Charge per set £4.75 (sets in folders £1.55) per 12 weeks. ILL charge £10 (£20 if supplied by more than 1 library).|
|Surrey||Annual subscription; number of scores; duration of loan; reservation and ILL fees||Subscription, Surrey & W Sussex groups £25, others £32. Loans, per month, per set (20): to Surrey & W Sussex groups £5 (£4 per packaged vocal set), to others £7 (£6 per packaged set). Reservation £3 per set. ILL: £5 per application to other libraries.|
|Trafford||Number of scores||1-40 scores £25; 41-80 £30; 81-120 £35; over 120 £40.|
|Wandsworth||Number of scores||Up to 40 scores £15.20; over 40 £21.50 (more than one charge if more than 1 ILL request involved).|
|Warwickshire||Number of scores||£1 per score; £5 per part-song set (around 15-40 copies).|
|Westminster||No charge||No charge|
|Yorkshire||Number of scores; administration charge; postage||Yorkshire group: vocal scores £1.60 each; small scores £1 each; part songs £1.50 per wallet (c. 10-12 copies). Admin. charge £5.Non-Yorkshire group: vocal scores £2.50 each; small £1.50; part songs £5 per wallet. Admin. charge £10.|
Two obvious facts are shown by the table. First, nearly every authority makes a charge of some kind (including annual subscription), for loans, reservations or both, the exceptions being Westminster which makes no charge and Rochdale which does not charge for items held in stock. Secondly, with the exception of Portsmouth and Southampton, no two of these authorities have the same system of charges. Liverpool and Nottingham have an annual subscription and make no additional charge for loans (apart from delivery and inter-library loan charges). Derbyshire and Lincolnshire have an annual subscription but offer borrowers the option of paying for each loan. Essex, Hampshire, Oldham, Suffolk and Surrey have an annual subscription but also charge for each loan.
Most of the authorities (21 out of 31) make charges which take into account the number of scores borrowed. Eleven take into account the duration of the loan, and 8 of these take into account both the number of scores and duration. Many authorities make smaller charges for sets of part songs; Kent is unusual in defining these by length of performance (less than 5 minutes).
An indication of the variation in levels of charges can be obtained by comparing the charges made by different authorities for similar loans. For instance, the charges made by a number of authorities for lending 40 vocal scores of a major choral work for three months to a local borrower, excluding authorities with an annual subscription and excluding any additional charge for ILLs, are as follows:
Blackburn with Darwen £15.00
Brighton & Hove 45.00
Cheshire East 27.00
City of London 5.00
Richmond upon Thames 30.00
Rochdale 8.00 or free
It seems unlikely that most of the differences can be justified on any rational grounds; and, as explained above, the eleven authorities whose charges to local borrowers take into account the duration of the loan appear to be acting unlawfully.
Should the law be amended?
The present situation is clearly unsatisfactory. At least a substantial minority of library authorities are making loan charges to local borrowers, contrary to the provisions of the 1964 Act. It is arguable that, in spite of this, the present system is working and therefore does not need to be fixed, but there are two objections to that view.
The first objection is that the charges made are, at least in the majority of cases, not unreasonable and therefore ought not to be unlawful. It is one thing to require a library to lend single copies of books free of charge, but quite another to apply the same rule to a loan of 50 or more vocal scores of a major choral work.
The second objection is that, for an authority which feels obliged to comply with the law, the ban on loan charges is a serious disincentive to the provision of an adequate music lending service and therefore operates against the interests of borrowers. There is, therefore, a strong case for amending the law to allow authorities to charge for lending sets of scores.
If this were done, it is likely that the variations in charges between different authorities would be considerably reduced. Complete uniformity would be unattainable and unnecessary, but it would be possible to devise a standard system of charges to which authorities could be encouraged to conform.